Two conditions, and both of them have to hold.
You are shortlisting for an interview and the bar is at least 3 years of experience and a test score of 70 or better. Both have to be true — a brilliant test result does not buy someone the experience. Mark each applicant in column D.
Solve it on your own to keep the bonus. Each hint gets one step closer to the formula.
The same formula in the other shapes it takes at work.
This is the grid you start with. Cell references in the task — B6, C2 — point at the row numbers and column letters below.
| A | B | C | D | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Applicant | Years | Test score | Shortlist |
| 2 | R. Okafor | 5 | 78 | |
| 3 | L. Marchetti | 2 | 91 | |
| 4 | S. Beckett | 4 | 70 | |
| 5 | D. Halvorsen | 7 | 64 | |
| 6 | N. Achterberg | 3 | 85 |
Two applicants sit exactly on a boundary: one has exactly 3 years, one scored exactly 70. Both make the list, because the rule says "or better". That is the whole difference between >= and >, and it is the most common way a shortlist quietly drops someone who qualified.